room, when he secured both the doors and returned. Then he and Hurry pursued the subject, but, as the purport of all that was material in this discourse will appear in the narrative, it need not be related here, in detail. The reader, however, can have no difficulty in comprehending the morality that presided over their conference. It was in truth that, which, in some form or other, rules most of the acts of men, and in which the controlling principle is that one wrong will justify another. Their enemies paid for scalps, and this was sufficient to justify the colony for retaliating. It is true, the French used the same argument, a circumstance, as Hurry took occasion to observe in answer to one of Deerslayer's objections, that proved its truth, as mortal enemies would not be likely to have recourse to the same reason, unless it were a good one. But, neither Hutter, nor Hurry was a man likely to stick at trifles, in matters connected with the rights of the aborigines, since it is one of the consequences of aggression that it hardens the conscience, as the only means of quieting it. In the most peaceable state of the country, a species of warfare was carried on between the Indians, especially those of the Canadas, and men of their caste, and the moment an actual and recognised warfare existed, it was regarded as the means of lawfully revenging a thousand wrongs, real and imaginary. Then, again, there was some truth, and a good deal of expediency in the principle of retaliation, of which they both availed themselves, in particular to answer the objections of their juster minded and more scrupulous companion. »You must fight a man with his own we'pons, Deerslayer,« cried Hurry, in his uncouth dialect, and in his dogmatical manner of disposing of all moral propositions - »If he's f'erce, you must be f'ercer; if he's stout of heart, you must be stouter. This is the way to get the better of christian, or savage; by keepin' up to this trail, you'll get soonest to the ind of your journey.« »That's not Moravian doctrine, which teaches that all are to be judged according to their talents, or l'arning; the Injin like an Injin, and the white-man like a white-man. Some of their teachers say that if you're struck on the cheek, it's a duty to turn the other side of the face,