St Louis County St Louis Circuit
Court
June Term 1823
John OFallon William
Clark Beranrd Pratte Auguste Choteau
and
Robert Wash by their
Attorney Complain,
of Stephen Rector of a plea of Trespass on the
Case upon promises For that whereas hereto--
fore
to wit on the eighteenth day of Septem-
ber in the year One Thousand
eight hundred and twenty one
at St Louis , aforesaid the said Defendant made
his certain note in writing commonly
called a
promissory note the
date whereof is the
same day
and year
aforesaid and now to the Court shewn
by which said promissory the said Defendant
then & there promised to pay one Elias Rector or
order sixty days after the date of the said prom
issory note the sum of
eight hundred dollars negotiable and
payable in the Missouri Bank without defalca-
tion for value received And the said
Elias Rector
to whom
or to whose order the
payment of the said
sum of money in the said
promissory note specified was
thereby directed to be made after the
making of the
said promissory note and before the payment of
the
said sum of
money therein specified to
wit on the
day and
year last aforesaid at the at the county
aforesaid
indorsed the said promissory note to one Thomas F .
Riddick
President of the Bank of Missouri
and thereby then & there ordered and appointed the said
sum of money in the said
promissory specified to be
paid to the said Thomas F Riddick . And
the
said Thomas F Riddick (by the name and
description of Tho
Riddick Pr. BK Missr.
to whom or to whose order
the payment of the said sum of money in the said
promissory note specified
was by the said endorsement
directed to be made after the making of the
said promisso
ry note and the endorsement aforesaid and before
the
payment of the said sum of money in the said note
specified to wit on aforesaid at aforesaid idnorsed
the said promissory note to the Plaintiffs and thereby
then & there ordered and
appointed the said sum of
money in the said note specified to be
paid to the
said Plaintiffs and then
& there delevered
the said prom
issory
note so endorsed as
aforesaid to the said Plaintiffs
By means whereof the said Defendant then & there became liable
to pay to the said Plaintiffs the said sum of money
in the said note
specified according to the
effect and of the endorsement so made
as aforesaid and being so liable he the said
Defendant in consideration
thereof afterwards to
wit
on aforesaid at be aforesaid undertook and then
& there faithfully
promised the Plaintiffs to pay them
the said sum of money in the said note specified
accord-
ing to the tenor and effect of said note
and of the said indorsement so made as afore-
said. Nevertheless the said Defendant often requested
so to do hath not paid to the said Plaintiffs the said
sum of money in the said note specified or any part thereof
according to the
tenor and effect of said
note and of
the endorsements so made
thereon as aforesaid nor hath
the said Defendant paid the said sum of money in any
wise or to any person or persons whatever. but the
same to
the said Plaintiffs to pay the said Def-
endant hath hitherto wholly
neglected and refused
and still does neglect and refuse to the damage
of the said Plaintiffs of twelve hundred dollars
and therefore they sue
Wash
&
Attys for
Plffs
County of St Louis Sct.The State of Missouri To the Sheriff of St Louis County Greeting
We Command you to
summon Stephen
Rector
that he be and appear before the
Judge of our
Circuit Court at the
next term thereof to be
held
at the City of St Louis within & for the County
of
St Louis on the first Monday of June
next then
and there to answer auno John O'Fallon William
Clark Bernard Pratte Auguste Chouteau
& Robert Wash
of a plea of Trespass on the case upon promises
to the damage of said plaintiffs twelve hundred dollars:
have you then there this
writ
Witness Archibald Gamble
Clerk of
our said Court at office this third
day of May 1823 Archibald Gamble Clerk
No 54
June term 1823
& others
vs
Stephen Rector
This is an action
of Trespass on the
case upon promises
Let a
summons
issue
Wash &Attys
A Gamble
filedMay 3rd, 1823
Executed this writ
on Stephen Rector
on
the5 th May
1833. in the City
of St Louis , by giving him
the writ & dec=
laration to read & his acknow
ledging the service
Jno R. Walker
ShffShffs fees $1.00
In the Circuit Court
June Term 1823
vs
Stephen Rector
And the said defendant by
his atty
comes and defends the wrong and
injury and says that he ought not
to pay the sum of money in said declaration
mentioned. because by law he is not
to pay the
same
Atty
for Dft
vs
S Rector
filed June
A Gamble Clk
In the Circuit Court october Term 1823
John OFallon et alvs
Stephen Rector
And the said defend
ant by his attorney comes and shews
here to the Court the
following reasons
for setting aside said
Judgment
1. that there was a filed
before
taking said Judgment
2. That no Judgment by could be taken after the filing of a
Atty
for Dft
& others
vs
Stephen Rector
Reasons
filed Nov 8th 1823 A Gamble Clk